
_GavelforGirls⚖️✨
178 subscribers
About _GavelforGirls⚖️✨
From Student to Solicitor⚖️ This page is dedicated to the Dennings and Falanas who spent their lives bent over stoves and Dishes instead Of Gavels and benches because they had the misfortune of being born a woman ✨
Similar Channels
Swipe to see more
Posts

Good evening lovelies, Sorry it's coming late, Been busy with tests and exams. Wish me well😭

*Ramadan Kareem to the Muslim Queens and Gentlemen of _GavelforGirls⚖️✨!* May this sacred month bring you abundant blessings, peace, and fulfillment. May your fasting, prayers, and good deeds be accepted and never go to waste. As you strive for spiritual growth, remember to also take care of your health—stay hydrated, eat nourishing Suhoor and Iftar meals, and get enough rest. Wishing you a Ramadan filled with mercy and joy. _With love,_ _Deborah David (LadyNezuko)_ _Founder_ , _GavelforGirls⚖️✨_


Queens and Gentlemen, I welcome you into the month of March with love, warmth, and fresh beginnings! May this month bring you joy and happiness. ✨💜 _Love_ , _LadyNezuko, Founder of_ _GavelforGirls ⚖️✨_


*Maxim of the day* *Ad Nauseam* The Latin phrase "ad nauseam" literally translates to "to the point of nausea" or "until nausea." It emerged from classical Latin usage and became a common rhetorical and logical term in medieval scholarly discourse. The phrase describes the practice of repeating something so frequently that it becomes tiresome or even sickening. In rhetoric and argumentation, it refers to the act of making a point through excessive repetition rather than through the strength of the argument itself. The historical development of this concept is particularly interesting. While the Romans used it primarily as a descriptive term for excessive repetition, it evolved during the Middle Ages into a recognized logical fallacy. Medieval scholars categorized it alongside other fallacies like "argumentum ad hominem" (attacking the person rather than the argument) and "argumentum ad populum" (appealing to popular belief rather than facts). In modern usage, "ad nauseam" has found its way into legal discourse, including constitutional law. This brings us to its relationship with the Nigerian Constitution. The Nigerian legal system, being based on common law principles inherited from British colonial rule, often deals with the concept of "ad nauseam" in two key contexts: First, in constitutional interpretation, Nigerian courts have had to address situations where legal arguments are repeated excessively without adding new substance. The Supreme Court of Nigeria has occasionally referenced this concept when dealing with repetitive litigation or arguments that merely restate previously settled constitutional matters. Second, the principle appears in discussions of fundamental rights under the Nigerian Constitution, particularly regarding freedom of expression. Courts must balance the right to make repeated arguments against the need for efficient judicial processes. This becomes especially relevant in constitutional cases where similar challenges to government actions are brought repeatedly. In Nigerian constitutional practice, there's an important distinction between legitimate repetition necessary for establishing precedent and harmful repetition that wastes judicial resources. The courts have developed guidelines for managing repeated constitutional challenges, often citing the principle of "ad nauseam" when explaining why certain repetitive arguments cannot be entertained indefinitely. To better understand this concept, consider a practical example: Imagine a constitutional challenge to a law that has been thoroughly reviewed and upheld by the Supreme Court of Nigeria. If litigants continue to bring essentially the same challenge repeatedly without new legal arguments or changed circumstances, courts might invoke the concept of "ad nauseam" to explain why such repetitive challenges cannot be sustained. The significance of "ad nauseam" extends beyond legal contexts. In public discourse and policy debates, it serves as a reminder that the mere repetition of an argument doesn't strengthen its validity. This principle has become particularly relevant in the age of mass media and social networks, where repeated messaging can sometimes be mistaken for substantive argumentation. The development of this concept continues in contemporary times, especially as it relates to constitutional interpretation in emerging democracies like Nigeria. Courts and legal scholars are still working to strike the right balance between allowing necessary repetition for legal clarity and preventing wasteful redundancy in constitutional arguments. ©_GavelforGirls⚖️✨


And the votes have spoken, Anticipate *Hightree's Case* this Sunday ✨⚖️

*CARLILL V CARBOLIC SMOKEBALL & CO.(1893)* CITATION: Carlill V Carbolic Smokeball Company(1893) 1 QB 256 (CA) AREA OF LAW: Contract Law FACTS OF THE CASE. 1. The Carbolic Smokeball Company advertise that their product, a smoke ball, could prevent Influenza. They offered £100 to anyone who used the product and still contracted the flu. 2. The advertisement stated that £1,000 had been deposited in a bank, "Showing their sincerity on the matter". 3. Mrs Louisa Carlill purchased and used the smoke ball as directed, but still contracted Influenza, she then attempted to claim the £1,000 reward. 4. the company refused to pay, arguing that the advertisement was not a valid contract. LEGAL QUESTION The main question was whether the advertisement constituted a valid offer that could be accepted as a form of a binding contract. DECISION OF THE COURT The Court of Appeal ruled in favor of Mrs Carlill, stating that she had accepted by performing the conditions stated in the offer. KEY PRINCIPLES 1. An advertisement can constitute a valid offer if it is clear, definite and shows an intention to be bound. 2. Acceptance of an offer can be made by conduct without the need for formal communication to the offeror. 3. The deposit of money indicated the company's intentions to be bound by the offer. This case remains influential in contract law, particularly in areas concerning offers, acceptance, and the formation of unilateral contracts. It is often studied as a fundamental case in contract law. ©_GavelforGirls⚖️✨


To every Matriculating student of Lagos State University (LASU) I wish you a happy matriculation and smooth journey in this citadel of knowledge 🥂

ANTICIPATE GUYS!!!! 💜🩷🎀 Something impactful is on the way! Get ready to support girls in need with Padded in Pink—a Gavel for Girls initiative making a difference in menstrual health. Stay tuned!⚖️✨ Love, _Deborah David (Lady Nezuko), Founder of _GavelforGirls_
