
Real Estate Regulation Act Updates- MAHARERA
91 subscribers
About Real Estate Regulation Act Updates- MAHARERA
REGULAR UPDATES ON RERA RULES REGULATION, EVENTS, ORDERS, CIRCULARS
Similar Channels
Swipe to see more
Posts

https://indianexpress.com/article/cities/mumbai/maharera-developers-housing-project-information-9841280/

Haryana / Gurugram RERA imposes Rs 50L fine on builder Gurugram RERA imposes Rs 50L fine on builder The Real Estate Regulatory (RERA) Authority, Gurugram, has imposed a penalty of Rs 50 lakh on real estate promoter M/s Birla Estates Private Limited for the violation of Section 3 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act 2016. Section 3 of the Act states that no promoter shall advertise without registering the project. The promoter had applied for the registration of its upcoming real estate group housing colony, namely Birla Akira, located at Sector 31 and 32-A, Gurugram, under Section 4 of the RERA Act 2016. The promoter published the advertisement while documents of the project were still under scrutiny at the Authority and registration certificate was awaited. *It is important to update and appraise the promoters to adhere to the Rera guidelines..

https://www.ahmedabadmirror.com/rera-can-hear-old-society-members-in-redevpt-projects/81885079.html

[2025] 171 taxmann.com 458 Judgment by the Hon'ble Punjab and Haryana High Court in the case of Ramprastha Developers (P.) Ltd. v. State of Haryana (CWP-24591-2024) ‘Unregistered’ project falls under RERA

Sell assets of firm’s directors to recover homebuyers’ dues: K-RERA Bench - https://www.newindianexpress.com/cities/bengaluru/2025/Feb/08/sell-assets-of-firms-directors-to-recover-homebuyers-dues-k-rera-bench

https://www.msn.com/en-in/news/India/mumbai-maharera-urges-district-collector-to-take-action-against-defaulting-developers-owing-249-crore-in-refunds-to-homebuyers/ar-AA1yklSN

*Minority members of a co-operative society opposing redevelopment* of the society building should be held accountable for the delay caused, the Bombay High Court suggested while ordering the non co-operating members to vacate their residential units for the redevelopment of the building [Choice Developers v. Pantnagar Pearl CHS Ltd. & Ors.]