CASE LAW πŸ“– WhatsApp Channel

CASE LAW πŸ“–

113 subscribers

About CASE LAW πŸ“–

PLD, SCMR, PLJ, PCRLJ, MLD YLR, CLC, and Many Other Case Law πŸ‡΅πŸ‡°

Similar Channels

Swipe to see more

Posts

CASE LAW πŸ“–
CASE LAW πŸ“–
5/17/2025, 8:57:22 PM

Sheikh Liaquat Hussain -Vs.- Federation from 1999, authored by Chief Justice Ajmal Mian, the decision of the nine-member bench makes it clear that Article 245 mandates that the military acts in aid of civil power, and not in displacement of it. "This means that civilians cannot be tried by military tribunals. Supreme Court also considered this Judgment in 2015 while passing the Full Bench Judgment.

CASE LAW πŸ“–
CASE LAW πŸ“–
3/1/2025, 1:55:31 PM

PLJ 2025 SC (Cr.C.) 64; 2024 SCMR 1773 It is a settled principle that documentary evidence carries a presumption of truth. The postmortem report and doctor’s statement confirm that the injured remained at the scene for a significant period. Had the complainant and PW been present, immediate medical aid could have prevented rigor mortis. The doctor noted lunar-shaped injuries, contradicting the witnesses’ claims of dagger blows. While related witnesses’ testimonies cannot be disregarded, they require careful scrutiny Their unnatural conduct raises doubts about their presence, suggesting the occurrence was unseen. Criminal Appeal No. 577/2019 & Crl. P. 596/2016.

CASE LAW πŸ“–
CASE LAW πŸ“–
3/1/2025, 3:36:57 PM

Ψ§ΩŽΩ„Ω„Ω‘Ω°Ω‡ΩΩ…ΩŽΩ‘ Ψ³ΩŽΩ„ΩΩ‘Ω…Ω’Ω†ΩΩŠ مِنْ Ψ±ΩŽΩ…ΩŽΨΆΩŽΨ§Ω†ΩŽΨŒ ΩˆΩŽΨ³ΩŽΩ„ΩΩ‘Ω…Ω’ Ψ±ΩŽΩ…ΩŽΨΆΩŽΨ§Ω†ΩŽ Ω„ΩΩŠΨŒ وَΨͺΩŽΨ³ΩŽΩ„ΩŽΩ‘Ω…Ω’Ω‡Ω Ω…ΩΩ†ΩΩ‘ΩŠ مُΨͺΩŽΩ‚ΩŽΨ¨ΩŽΩ‘Ω„Ω‹Ψ§. Ramadan Mubarak

Image
CASE LAW πŸ“–
CASE LAW πŸ“–
2/28/2025, 7:03:12 PM

Whether a nominee can substitute a heir(s) after the death of a Member of a Society under the Co-operative Societies Act, 1925? C.P.L.A.2095-L/2016 Matloob, etc v. Taj Din (deceased) thorugh LRs, etc Mr. Justice Shahid Bilal Hassan 15-01-2025.

CASE LAW πŸ“–
CASE LAW πŸ“–
2/26/2025, 5:50:49 PM

Pakistan Rangers can exercise powers under sections 21, 22, 37(2) & 38 of CNSA, 1997 within the areas of their jurisdiction. Crl. Misc. 3952/25 Maqbool Ali Vs The State etc. Mr. Justice Muhammad Amjad Rafiq 20-02-2025 2025 LHC 376

πŸ‘ 1
CASE LAW πŸ“–
CASE LAW πŸ“–
3/1/2025, 1:56:11 PM
Image
CASE LAW πŸ“–
CASE LAW πŸ“–
2/27/2025, 8:40:34 PM

PLD 2024 Lahore 676 Summary suit for recovery based on a cheque---Pre-requisites---Proof of contractual relationship/agreement between the parties---No suit under O.XXXVII, C.P.C can be filed without an agreement/relationship between the parties---Cheque is a Negotiable instrument under the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and without negotiation of the parties on an agreement, no such suit could be filed---Suit under O. XXXVII of the C.P.C has to be filed along with supporting Negotiable instruments of the parties, instrument through a contract or through any relationship, which must be express, implied or in written form or oral.

πŸ‘ 1
CASE LAW πŸ“–
CASE LAW πŸ“–
2/21/2025, 7:44:42 PM

2025 SCMR 374 Judicial discretion must be exercised judiciously and transparently, based on established principles and sound reasoning.

πŸ‘ 1
CASE LAW πŸ“–
CASE LAW πŸ“–
2/5/2025, 4:55:34 PM

It is a settled rule that the mother could not alienate the property of the minor without permission of the Guardian Judge. R.F.A 67289/19 Ghulam Hassan etc Vs Ijaz Naseer etc 2025 CLC 196 #law

πŸ‘ 2
CASE LAW πŸ“–
CASE LAW πŸ“–
2/24/2025, 6:55:05 PM

S.162 of Land Revenue Act clearly manifests that ninety days are prescribed in filing of appeal against the order of the Commissioner to the Board of Revenue. Pertinently, provision of Section 167 of the β€œAct” having expressly providing that limitation shall be governed by the provisions of Limitation Act, 1908 in filing of appeal, review or revision filed under this Act. The exercise of constitutional jurisdiction in terms of Article 199 of the β€œConstitution” is discretionary which can only be invoked in extraordinary and exceptional circumstances.The Petitioners have badly failed to point out any illegality or material irregularity in the impugned order, warranting interference by this Court in exercise of constitutional jurisdiction. This Court while invoking its constitutional jurisdiction always exercises restraint in interfering with the judgment or order passed in exercise of revisional jurisdiction unless some perversity or patent illegality is floating on the surface of record. The constitutional jurisdiction can only be exercised in such an eventuality if the impugned judgment or order suffers with certain legal infirmities or patent illegalities, resulting into failure of justice. Writ Petition No.4078 of 2021 Muazzam Ali Goraya etc. V/S Member (Judicial-I) etc. Date of hearing 21.01.2025.

πŸ‘ 1
Link copied to clipboard!