Atheist in the first premise mistakenly assumes that a Perfect God by rational necessity must remove suffering. That is far from truth. Because in the mind's eye, NO RATIONAL ABSURDITY is entertained from the fact that God creates and then tortures someone for eternity in Hell fire. This means God's power pertains to such a possibility. Thus, it is NOT necessary, that God must remove a creature from suffering. It is not rationally necessary for God to do so, nor God is obligated to do as such because He has no judge, nor is He subjected to Morality by rational necessity. ---- The atheist believes God is obligated to do as such based on his twisted principles of rationality and morality. This means the GOD he claims to be perfect (based on his twisted notions) is in fact a contingent being that itself requires something other than itself to bring it into existence. Add on top of that, the God he thinks is imperfect (a conclusion reached in the atheist's mind as a result of atheist's metaphorical rape of logical principles), is in fact the ONLY perfect being in reality. Had he truly bothered to understand and consistently utilized logic. Subhan Allah.