https://ngl.link/hamzakhan25339 Straw-manning 101. I am not against science. I am against pseudo-science. There's a difference. Pseudo-science is: 1. Making claims without evidence. 2. Substantiating claims with evidence that do not support the claim. 3. Fooling the audience into thinking that evidence has been presented when the evidence does not even remotely support the claim. EXAMPLE OF PSEUDOSCIENCE: You wrote "We know beyond reasonable doubt that the moon never split in two because we've been to the moon and photographed it" ^This is pesudo-science. It is similar to the following argument: The proof that Ali is a vegetarian is that we have photographed Ali eating only vegetables. ^This does not prove that Ali never ate meat in the past unless you can account for every moment of his past. It only proves that Ali did not eat meat in the moment in which he was photographed. That's pretty much it. =========