Arbitration: *Whether while exercising power under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, it would be permissible to hold that some of the claims raised are non-arbitrable or fall within excepted category? – Supreme Court* _Mr. Justice P.S. Narasimha and Mr. Justice Manoj Misra_ Case Citation: (2025) ibclaw.in 180 SC Whether while exercising power under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the Court has to confine its consideration as to the existence of an arbitration agreement between the parties. If so, whether it would be permissible, while exercising jurisdiction under Section 11, to hold that some of the claims raised are non-arbitrable or fall within excepted category? https://ibclaw.in/office-for-alternative-architecture-vs-ircon-infrastructure-and-services-ltd-supreme-court/