🔆 Ethical Perspective on Electronic Monitoring of Prisoners 📍 Balancing Overcrowding and Rights ⚖️ Electronic monitoring must balance reducing prison overcrowding with protecting privacy and dignity. 📍 Key Ethical Concerns ✅ Privacy Risks: 📱 Tracking devices may violate fundamental rights under Article 21, impacting privacy and bodily autonomy. ✅ Stigmatization: 🎯 Public knowledge of monitoring could lead to social stigma and loss of dignity for individuals. ✅ Proportionality: ⚡️ Use only in severe cases; applying it to minor offenders may be excessive and unfair. ✅ Voluntary Consent: 🤝 Respect informed consent to uphold individual autonomy. 📍 Utilitarian Perspective 🌟 Can reduce overcrowding and improve rehabilitation, but ethical implementation is key to avoiding harm. 📍 Recommendations 💡 Transparency: Clear rules on its use. 👁 Accountability: Oversight to prevent misuse. 🤲 Support: Combine monitoring with rehabilitation programs for holistic reform. 🔑 Conclusion 📢 Monitoring can be effective if implemented ethically, ensuring privacy, fairness, and human dignity. #ethics