Thursday 27 February 2025 *EVENING NEWS UPDATES* _• USD: ZiG Official Exchange – Z$25.69_ • _Black Market Rate - Zig 30:USD1_ • _Innscor in-store – Z$35_ • _KFC, Slice, Eat'n'Lick – Z$35_ New members who wish to receive detailed local, regional and international news from Ignite Media Zimbabwe should "follow" our channel on the link below: https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VaASRLX6mYPM2XphWy2n *For advertising inquiries call, text or Whatsapp us on +263 778 242 692* *THE HEADLINES* *Mhlanga To Spend Another Night In Prison As Bail Ruling Is Delayed: Magistrate attends ‘funeral’ as journalist Blessed Mhlanga languishes in jail, bail ruling postponed to Friday* *Every day that passes perpetuates his suffering for doing his work – lawyer says as journalist Mhlanga’s bail ruling is postponed again* *“Blessed Mhlanga Being Treated Like A Convicted Criminal”* *The Details: President Emmerson Mnangagwa to meet War Veterans and ‘talk’ as Cde Bombshell Geza demands his resignation* *Factionalism rocks Zanu-PF's in Bulawayo: currently divided along two main factions..one loyal to President Emmerson Mnangagwa and the other supporting his deputy, Constantino Chiwenga, who is considered a leading figure in the party's succession race* *Where is the Opposition as Zimbabweans now depend on warring ZANU-PF factions for salvation? Mbofana* *Harare City Council Vows To Demolish Unapproved Shopping Malls* *Two Pregnant Soldiers Among 200 South African Troops Returned From DRC* *Betting Shops vs Betting Apps: Which Is Better in 2025?* *South Africa launches countrywide blitz on illegal immigrants* *Trump2025 has ordered HIV projects in SA funded through USAID to shut down —immediately and permanently* *Zimbabwe external trade statistics for January 2025* *THE DETAILS WITH IGNITE MEDIA ZIMBABWE* _*Mhlanga To Spend Another Night In Prison As Bail Ruling Is Delayed: Magistrate attends ‘funeral’ as journalist Blessed Mhlanga languishes in jail, bail ruling postponed to Friday*_ The ongoing detention of Alpha Media Holdings (AMH) senior journalist, Blessed “Dhara” Mhlanga, has taken a dramatic turn, with his bail ruling postponed until 12 PM on Friday. The stand-in magistrate, Marewanazvo Gofa, cited the bereavement of Farai Gwatima, the magistrate who initially heard Mhlanga’s bail application, as the reason for the delay. Mhlanga, who appeared at the Harare Magistrates’ Court on Thursday clad in prison attire, faces serious charges under Section 164 of the Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act for allegedly transmitting messages that incite violence. The charges stem from interviews Mhlanga conducted with Blessed Geza, a liberation war veteran and ZANU PF central committee member, on January 27 and February 11, 2025. These interviews were broadcast on AMH’s terrestrial television station, HSTV. The State alleges that Mhlanga broadcast content from a press conference addressed by Geza, in which the war veteran called on President Emmerson Mnangagwa to resign over alleged grand corruption and other misdeeds. AMH are the publishers of NewsDay, The Standard, and Zimbabwe Independent. Mhlanga had initially appeared in court on Tuesday and was remanded in custody by Magistrate Farai Gwatima, pending the bail ruling, which was initially scheduled for Thursday. The decision to make Mhlanga wear prison garb ahead of the bail ruling has sparked outrage and accusations of selective justice. Critics have pointed out that other high-profile figures, such as journalist Hopewell Chin’ono and politician Job Sikhala, were allowed to wear their own clothes while in remand. Abel Runga, speaking to Change Radio before the postponement, described Mhlanga’s treatment as a case of selective justice. “Blessed Mhlanga should not be treated like a convicted prisoner, especially since the state’s case against him is weak,” Runga said. He also argued that the arrest was an attack on constitutional provisions, particularly Section 61 (freedom of expression), Section 62 (right to access information), and Section 141 (protecting public participation in law-making processes). Toneo, a local media personality, has even called for a media blackout in protest of Mhlanga’s detention, stating, “If they don’t give Blessed Mhlanga bail, my media house will stop publishing or posting news for 14 days.” The Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) has also weighed in on the matter, calling on Zimbabwean authorities to immediately release Mhlanga. “It is absolutely shameful that Blessed Mhlanga has been thrown behind bars simply because he gave voice to a war veteran’s criticism of Zimbabwe’s government,” said CPJ Africa Program Coordinator, Muthoki Mumo, in Nairobi. “Zimbabwean authorities should free Mhlanga unconditionally and respond to their citizens’ concerns, rather than punishing the messenger.” Mhlanga, who works with the privately owned Heart and Soul TV, had previously reported that three armed men came to his office searching for him on February 17, soon after which the police phoned him to ask him to come in for questioning. On February 21, the police issued a statement seeking information about Mhlanga’s whereabouts. Mhlanga responded to the police summons on February 24 and was subsequently arrested. According to the Zimbabwe chapter of the Media Institute of Southern Africa, the Zimbabwe Lawyers for Human Rights network, and Mhlanga’s lawyer Chris Mhike, he faces two counts of transmission of data messages “inciting violence or damage to property” under the 2021 Cyber and Data Protection Act. If found guilty, Mhlanga could face up to five years in jail and a fine of up to US$700. Prosecutors had opposed Mhlanga’s bail application, arguing that he was a flight risk, Mhike told CPJ. Mhlanga was previously assaulted and arrested in 2022 while covering the attempted arrest of an opposition politician, highlighting a pattern of harassment against journalists in Zimbabwe. Veteran award-winning journalist Hopewell Chin’ono expressed his lack of surprise at the postponement, stating that authorities “always do that when their victim is innocent.” Hopewell Chin’ono posted on X: “As expected, the ruling on journalist Blessed Mhlanga’s bail application has been postponed to 12 PM on Friday. They always do this when their victim is innocent—cowards!” The postponement of Mhlanga’s bail ruling has further heightened concerns about the state of press freedom in Zimbabwe and the potential for the government to use the law to silence critical voices. The eyes of the nation, and the international community, will now be on the Harare Magistrates’ Court at 12 PM on Friday, awaiting the outcome of this crucial case. _*Every day that passes perpetuates his suffering for doing his work – lawyer says as journalist Mhlanga’s bail ruling is postponed again*_ The bail ruling in the case Alpha Media Holdings (AMH) journalist Blessed Mhlanga is accused of transmitting information that incites violence or damage to property, has been postponed to Friday 12 pm by stand-in Magistrate Marewanazvo Gofa. Gofa deferred the ruling, citing that Magistrate Farai Gwatima, who is presiding over Mhlanga’s case is absent, attending to a bereavement. Mhlanga was arrested on Monday after presenting himself at the Harare Central Police Station in the company of his lawyer, Chris Mhike. He is charged under Section 164 of the Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act Chapter 9:23. The charges relate to him granting an interview to Blessed Geza, a war veteran and a staunch opponent of the Mnangagwa 2030 agenda. Geza had issued press briefings through AMH broadcaster HSTv, calling for President Emmerson Mnangagwa to resign from office immediately. Mhlanga is the head of HSTv. - Blessed Mhlanga: Why his arrest is unlawful and State-facilitated abduction - Journalist Blessed Mhlanga to spend two more nights in jail as bail ruling is deferred to February 27 Mhike said he is disappointed in the postponement of the bail ruling, which means his client, Mhlanga, will spend another night in jail for doing his journalistic work. “We are disappointed with this development because every day that passes with this journalist in custody is an elongation or perpetuation of his suffering, suffering for doing his work as a journalist,” said Mhike. “We sympathise with the circumstances of the magistrate, but we remain deeply aggrieved by the fact that the time in which our client is in custody has been made longer, so we wait with hope that when we come back tomorrow (February 28) Blessed will find his liberty once again.” _*”Blessed Mhlanga Being Treated Like A Convicted Criminal”*_ Alpha Media Holdings (AMH) senior journalist, Blessed “Dhara” Mhlanga, appeared at the Harare Magistrates’ Court on Thursday wearing prison attire. Mhlanga is facing charges under Section 164 of the Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act for allegedly transmitting messages that incite violence. The charges are related to interviews Mhlanga conducted with Blessed Geza, a liberation war veteran and ZANU PF central committee member, on January 27 and February 11, 2025. Mhlanga had initially appeared in court on Tuesday and was remanded in custody by Harare Magistrate Farai Gwatima, pending a ruling on his bail application, which was set for Thursday. Ahead of the bail ruling, Mhlanga was made to wear prison garb, sparking reactions from some who have raised concerns about the fairness of this treatment. Critics have pointed out that other figures, such as journalist Hopewell Chin’ono and politician Job Sikhala, were allowed to wear their own clothes while in remand. Before the ruling, Abel Runga spoke to Change Radio, describing Mhlanga’s treatment as a case of selective justice. Said Runga: Blessed Mhlanga should not be treated like a convicted prisoner, especially since the state’s case against him is weak. He also complained that the arrest in the first place is an attack on constitutional provisions, particularly Section 61 which guarantees the people of Zimbabwe the freedom of expression, Section 62 which guarantees the right to access information, and Section 141 which protects public participation in law-making processes. Toneo, a local media personality, has called for a media blackout in response to Mhlanga’s detention. He said: If they don’t give Blessed Mhlanga bail, my media house will stop publishing or posting news for 14 days. _*The Details: President Emmerson Mnangagwa to meet War Veterans and ‘talk’ as Cde Bombshell Geza demands his resignation*_ President Emmerson Mnangagwa is poised to engage in a critical dialogue with war veterans in the coming weeks, a move orchestrated amidst growing calls for his resignation from within the ranks of the liberation war heroes themselves. Zanu PF war veterans league boss Douglas Mahiya confirmed the impending meeting, highlighting its significance in addressing a multitude of issues impacting the ex-combatants. The meeting’s urgency is underscored by the vocal dissent emanating from a faction of war veterans, spearheaded by the firebrand Blessed “Bombshell” Geza, who has publicly expressed his dissatisfaction with Mnangagwa’s leadership. Geza, a former Zanla ex-combatant, has been at the forefront of calls for Mnangagwa’s resignation, accusing him of overseeing rampant corruption and nepotism, and of plotting to extend his term beyond the constitutionally mandated limit. Mahiya emphasised that the meeting would provide a crucial platform for veterans of the liberation struggle to air their grievances directly to the President. It is also envisioned as an opportunity for Mnangagwa to address the former liberators’ concerns and articulate his vision for their welfare. Speaking at the launch of the Harare provincial welfare fund, Mahiya stated, “After the successful launch of the war veterans welfare fund, we saw it fit that comrades meet with their fellow fighter to discuss and spend the day together. The meeting is going to happen two to three weeks from now. This is a testament to our government’s unwavering commitment to those who fought for our freedom.” The timing of this meeting is particularly sensitive, coinciding with Geza’s escalating campaign against Mnangagwa’s perceived bid to stay in power beyond 2028, when the President’s two-term limit expires. Geza has openly advocated for Vice President Chiwenga to take over the reins, further fueling speculation about potential divisions within the ruling party. Geza’s outspoken opposition to Mnangagwa’s “ED2030” mantra has drawn the ire of the state, resulting in criminal charges against him. Some observers view Geza’s prosecution as victimisation of a man who has bravely challenged Mnangagwa’s unpopular attempts to remain in office. In a recent press conference, Geza urged Zimbabweans to prepare for a national shutdown as calls for Mnangagwa’s resignation grow louder. “We implore you to resign peacefully. If you don’t resign in peace, people will use the constitution to exercise their right to push you out of office,” Geza said. He also warned the police that if they dared to beat or shoot demonstrators protesting against Mnangagwa, the public would hold them accountable in their own neighbourhoods. Geza also issued a 10-day ultimatum to Mnangagwa to resign or face unspecified action, although he later denied being behind the social media account that posted the threat. He has also declared that he will occupy the State House against all odds, adding that the “real drama” is about to unfold against Mnangagwa’s “machinations,” indicating his involvement in a broader political effort to remove the President. The war veteran’s defiance has raised concerns about growing dissent within Zanu-PF and the potential for unrest in Zimbabwe, which is already grappling with renewed political instability over Mnangagwa’s third term ambitions and perceived governance failures. Adding to the complexity of the situation, a groundswell of discontent is brewing within the ranks of Zimbabwe’s war veterans, with a growing number voicing their support for Geza’s call for Mnangagwa to step down. The War Veterans Pressure Group (WVPG) has emerged as the latest voice to condemn Mnangagwa’s government, citing alleged suppression of dissent, constitutional violations, and a perceived abandonment of the values that underpinned Zimbabwe’s hard-won independence. “To that end, our perception of the situation in the country resonates with that expressed by comrades, specifically, Cde Geza and war-time commanders who are demanding change,” the group stated, aligning themselves with Geza’s sentiments and the broader calls for reform. The WVPG went on to paint a grim picture of Zimbabwe’s current state, accusing State authorities of systemic abuse, economic mismanagement, and implementing policies that “reverse the gains of the revolution.” The group’s statement paints a picture of a nation “adrift in a sea of corruption, kleptocracy and lawlessness,” warning that the current trajectory dishonours the sacrifices made during the liberation war. The lobby group accused Mnangagwa’s government of betrayal following its decision to compensate white former farmers who lost their farms during Zimbabwe’s land reform programme at the turn of the century. Amidst this backdrop of growing dissent, the Mnangagwa administration is also rolling out the War Veterans Welfare Fund across all 10 provinces, spearheaded by Special Investments Presidential adviser Paul Tungwarara. The fund provides each province with US$150,000 in zero-percent revolving loans for war veterans to initiate projects. The initiative also includes the construction of houses and the drilling of solar-powered boreholes at the former liberation guerillas’ rural homes. While the government touts the War Veterans Welfare Fund as a genuine effort to improve the lives of ex-combatants, critics have suggested that the project is a thinly veiled attempt to buy the silence of war veterans who have become increasingly critical of Mnangagwa’s leadership. Tungwarara, however, vehemently denied that the project was a response to criticism from a section of war veterans. “These heroes battled tirelessly for our freedom. It is our responsibility to ensure their legacies endure. The project was already in the pipeline and it was just waiting to be executed,” he asserted. He framed the programme as a vital link between Zimbabwe’s liberation struggle and its modern development goals, stating, “Their courage inspires us to reject division and work collectively towards economic sovereignty.” Tungwarara also addressed the political tensions head-on, condemning unnamed groups allegedly using social media to destabilise Mnangagwa’s administration. “Let me be clear: you cannot challenge the President without confronting the entire presidium and Cabinet. We remain focused on positive efforts for Zimbabwe’s future,” he declared. Political analyst Pardon Taodzera believes that the planned dialogue demonstrates a strategic effort at reconciliation, aimed at averting a potentially damaging fallout with a wider section of war veterans. The analyst drew parallels to the events of 2017, when the late former President Robert Mugabe was ousted in a military coup following a breakdown in relations with ex-combatants who had become disillusioned with his leadership. “By creating a platform for war veterans to voice their concerns, he acknowledges their enduring role in Zimbabwe’s liberation while proactively mitigating tensions,” Taodzera commented. “This isn’t merely about appeasement — it’s an astute recognition that the stability of Zanu PF’s base hinges on maintaining trust with these liberation icons.” Taodzera highlighted the timing of the meeting, which coincides with both the rollout of the War Veterans Welfare Fund and growing dissent within the ex-combatant community, as being crucial to ensuring stability not only within the ruling Zanu PF party but also within the country as a whole. “The welfare initiatives, paired with open dialogue, signal a dual approach: tangible economic support complemented by political inclusivity,” Taodzera said. “This isn’t just about loans or a borehole — it’s about validating their legacy and securing their allegiance in Zimbabwe’s evolving socio-political landscape.” The analyst also underscored the symbolic significance of Mnangagwa leading the conversation himself. “His identity as ‘Cde Emmerson’ bridges generational and ideological divides. This meeting isn’t just a presidential obligation; it’s a reunion of comrades. That resonance could disarm critics and foster cohesion ahead of critical national objectives,” he concluded. _*Factionalism rocks Zanu-PF's in Bulawayo: currently divided along two main factions..one loyal to President Emmerson Mnangagwa and the other supporting his deputy, Constantino Chiwenga, who is considered a leading figure in the party's succession race*_ The Zanu-PF cell verification programme in Bulawayo has been marred by factionalism and infighting within the ruling party, sources have revealed. The exercise, which is essential for party organisation, has been delayed twice under unclear circumstances, with insiders attributing the setbacks to internal party divisions. Zanu-PF is currently divided along two main factions: one loyal to President Emmerson Mnangagwa and the other supporting his deputy, Constantino Chiwenga, who is considered a leading figure in the party's succession race. Tensions have intensified following reports that Mnangagwa's loyalists are pushing for an extension of his term by two years, from 2028 to 2030, despite the President's repeated declarations that he intends to step down in 2028 as per the Constitution. These unresolved tensions have impacted party activities, with the cell verification exercise being one of the casualties. Originally scheduled for February 15, the programme was first rescheduled to Sunday, February 23. However, it was once again postponed. A source close to the proceedings confirmed that the exercise would not take place as planned, and that it had been pushed to March, though no official explanation was given. "The situation remains tense. We were supposed to have cell verification on Sunday, but for the second time, it was postponed to March," the source said. "Factionalism is clearly at play here." Another insider confirmed that the new dates for the programme are set for March 1 and 2. In response, Zanu-PF Bulawayo province spokesperson Archibold Chiponda dismissed claims that factionalism was responsible for the delays, attributing the postponements to scheduling conflicts with other significant events. "First, there was a youth inter-district event, then a national war veterans fund lunch, and last week, there were National Youth Day commemorations," Chiponda explained. "The programme was postponed for logistical reasons, not because of factionalism. We are an organised organisation and do not engage in strategic ambiguity." Despite the official statements, the delays have raised concerns about the ongoing factional strife within Zanu-PF, which has plagued the party for years. The factional infighting traces its roots to the era of former President Robert Mugabe, whose failure to manage succession issues ultimately led to his downfall in a military coup in November 2017. The coup, led by Chiwenga, paved the way for Mnangagwa to take power. As the cell verification programme is rescheduled for early March, it remains unclear whether the internal tensions within Zanu-PF will continue to disrupt the party's activities in the lead-up to crucial elections. _*Where is the Opposition as Zimbabweans now depend on warring ZANU-PF factions for salvation? Mbofana*_ ZIMBABWE stands at a crossroads, teetering on the edge of yet another political precipice. The air is thick with tension as factions within the ruling ZANU-PF party lock horns over the future of President Emmerson Mnangagwa’s tenure. On one side, loyalists aligned with Mnangagwa are pushing to extend his presidency beyond the constitutional limit of two five-year terms, which would see him remain in power past 2028. On the other, a faction believed to back Vice President Constantino Chiwenga resists this move, with some voices within the party escalating their dissent into bold calls for Mnangagwa’s immediate resignation. Amid this cacophony of infighting, one question echoes louder than all others: where is the opposition? As Zimbabweans grapple with a crumbling economy, rampant corruption, and a decaying infrastructure, the so-called champions of the people are eerily silent, leaving the citizenry to pin their hopes on warring ZANU-PF factions whose motives may have little to do with the welfare of ordinary people. The debate over Mnangagwa’s term extension is not merely a procedural squabble; it is a battle for the soul of Zimbabwe’s political future. The Constitution, enacted in 2013 after a hard-fought referendum, clearly stipulates that a president may serve only two five-year terms. Mnangagwa, having assumed power in November 2017 following the coup that ousted Robert Mugabe and subsequently “winning” disputed elections in 2018 and 2023, is set to conclude his second term in 2028. Yet, his supporters within ZANU-PF are undeterred by this legal barrier. They argue that Mnangagwa needs more time to fulfill his ambitious Vision 2030, a blueprint to transform Zimbabwe into an upper-middle-income economy. This narrative, however, rings hollow to millions of Zimbabweans who have seen little tangible progress since the heralded “Second Republic” was ushered in with fanfare seven years ago. Instead of prosperity, the reality for over 80% of Zimbabweans is one of unrelenting hardship. According to the World Bank, extreme poverty has risen sharply, with more than 49% of the population living on less than $1.90 a day as of 2023. Unemployment hovers at a staggering 90% in the formal sector, forcing millions into a precarious informal economy where survival is a daily gamble. Inflation, though tempered by the introduction of the Zimbabwe Gold (ZiG) currency, remains a specter, eroding purchasing power and driving up the cost of basic goods. Health care systems are in tatters, with hospitals lacking essential drugs and equipment, while schools struggle to function amid chronic underfunding. Power generation, once a point of pride, has faltered, with citizens enduring rolling blackouts that can last up to 18 hours a day. These are the issues that gnaw at the core of ordinary Zimbabweans, yet the opposition—historically the voice of the downtrodden—offers no resistance, no outrage, no alternative vision. The silence of the opposition is deafening, but it is not merely a passive absence. It is a vacuum that has forced Zimbabweans to look within ZANU-PF itself for salvation, a perilous proposition given the party’s track record. Recently, voices like that of Blessed Geza, a ZANU-PF Central Committee member and war veteran, have emerged as unlikely beacons of dissent. Geza and his associates have not only opposed Mnangagwa’s term extension but have gone further, demanding his immediate resignation. They point to the undeniable: the impoverishment of millions, the unchecked corruption that siphons national wealth into the hands of a privileged elite, and the collapse of vital systems that once sustained the nation. Their rhetoric is bold, their stance fearless, but their motives remain murky. Are they genuinely moved by the plight of the people, or are they pawns in a broader power struggle between Mnangagwa and Chiwenga? History suggests the latter. The November 2017 coup that toppled Mugabe offers a sobering lesson. Back then, Zimbabweans flooded the streets of Harare, naively believing that the military’s intervention marked the dawn of a new era. The masses cheered as Mugabe’s 37-year reign ended, hopeful that Mnangagwa and his allies, including Chiwenga, would deliver the democratic reforms and economic recovery they so desperately craved. Yet, the “Second Republic” has proven to be a mirage. Far from alleviating suffering, it has deepened it. Corruption, already a festering wound under Mugabe, has metastasized under Mnangagwa. The 2024 Transparency International Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI) ranks Zimbabwe at 158 out of 180 countries, with a score of 21 out of 100,. The CPI measures perceived levels of public sector corruption, with scores ranging from 0 (highly corrupt) to 100 (very clean). Zimbabwe’s 2024 score indicates a significant perception of corruption within its public sector, making it the most corrupt nation in southern Africa. This is not an abstract statistic; it is a lived reality for Zimbabweans who watch as lucrative government contracts—worth millions of dollars—are awarded to shadowy companies linked to the ruling elite. Meanwhile, the country’s vast mineral wealth, including diamonds, gold, and lithium, is plundered and smuggled to destinations like the UAE and South Africa, leaving little for the people who rightfully own it. The looting of these resources should be a rallying cry for the opposition, yet they remain mute. The Citizens Coalition for Change (CCC), once a formidable force under Nelson Chamisa, has disintegrated into irrelevance. Its leadership fractured after the 2023 elections, with Sengezo Tshabangu—a figure previously unknown to most Zimbabweans—emerging as a self-styled interim Secretary General. Tshabangu’s ascent was no organic rise; it was a calculated maneuver facilitated by ZANU-PF’s machinery. With the blessing of the ZANU-PF-aligned Speaker of Parliament, Jacob Mudenda, and a complicit judiciary, Tshabangu orchestrated a wave of recalls that ousted over a dozen elected CCC parliamentarians. These lawmakers were then barred from contesting the subsequent by-elections, paving the way for ZANU-PF to secure a two-thirds majority in Parliament—a threshold it failed to achieve in the 2023 general elections but desperately needed to push through constitutional amendments, such as Mnangagwa’s term extension. Tshabangu’s group cannot be called a legitimate opposition. They are a caricature, a puppet faction propped up to give the illusion of democratic contestation. Their actions—cozying up to Mnangagwa, attending tours of his Precabe farm in Kwekwe, and endorsing his 2030 agenda—betray their true purpose: self-enrichment at the expense of the people they claim to represent. The lavish perks dangled by the ZANU-PF government—cars, loans, and parliamentary privileges—have proven too tempting to resist. In January 2025, Tshabangu openly declared his willingness to support Mnangagwa’s extended tenure, stating, “If our presence here improves your stay in power and makes the people of Zimbabwe happy, then let it be.” The irony is bitter: an opposition leader cheering for the very regime he should oppose, while the people he claims to serve languish in despair. So, where is the real opposition? The CCC’s collapse has left a void that no other party has filled. The faction led by Welshman Ncube has expelled Tshabangu, but its own legitimacy is questioned, mired in internal squabbles and lacking the grassroots momentum once wielded by Chamisa. Other opposition figures, like Jameson Timba, have been silenced through arrests and prolonged detentions, as seen in his five-month ordeal in 2024 before a suspended sentence was handed down. The state’s repressive tactics—beatings, arrests, and torture—have long been tools to crush dissent, but the opposition’s failure to adapt, reorganize, and resist is its own undoing. The result is a political landscape where Zimbabweans, desperate for change, have no choice but to turn to ZANU-PF’s internal factions, a gamble fraught with danger. Relying on a Chiwenga-backed faction for salvation is a risky bet. The Vice President, a former army general who orchestrated the 2017 coup alongside Mnangagwa, is no stranger to power plays. His supporters’ public opposition to Mnangagwa’s term extension has won him unlikely allies among war veterans and civil society, but his ambitions are unlikely to prioritize the ordinary citizen. The factional battles within ZANU-PF have historically been about control—of resources, patronage networks, and state machinery—rather than the welfare of the masses. The 2017 coup promised liberation but delivered continuity; a Chiwenga-led takeover could repeat the pattern. Analysts like Admire Mare have noted that any pushback against Mnangagwa’s agenda will require a broad alliance of forces—opposition parties, civil society, and dissenting ZANU-PF elements—but without a credible opposition to anchor this coalition, the effort risks being co-opted by self-serving elites. The absence of a genuine opposition leaves Zimbabweans vulnerable to the same trap they fell into in 2017. Back then, the euphoria of Mugabe’s ouster blinded many to the reality that power was merely shifting hands within the same party, not transforming the system. Today, as Geza and others rail against Mnangagwa, the temptation to rally behind them is strong, especially given the opposition’s inertia. But salvation from within ZANU-PF is a mirage. The party’s DNA—forged in decades of authoritarianism, violence, and kleptocracy—does not lend itself to the kind of radical reform Zimbabwe needs. Whether it’s Mnangagwa’s loyalists or Chiwenga’s faction, the endgame is power, not progress. The question remains: why is the opposition so quiet? Some argue it has been systematically dismantled—through recalls, court rulings, and state repression—a process that began with Tshabangu’s gambit in 2023. Others point to internal failures: infighting, lack of strategy, and an inability to capitalize on public discontent. Whatever the cause, the effect is clear: Zimbabweans are left adrift, forced to choose between a regime that has failed them and a faction whose promises may prove equally hollow. The opposition’s absence is not just a political failure; it is a betrayal of a people crying out for a voice. Until that voice emerges—bold, united, and untainted by ZANU-PF’s machinations—Zimbabwe’s salvation will remain a distant dream, caught in the crossfire of a ruling party at war with itself. _*Harare City Council Vows To Demolish Unapproved Shopping Malls*_ The City of Harare has warned against illegal structures springing up across the city and vowed to demolish unauthorised developments. The rise of informal businesses has led to an increase in new constructions and the conversion of old buildings into retail spaces. Large commercial properties are being repurposed into shopping malls with subdivided units for multiple operators. While this has proven profitable for property owners, concerns about the legality of these developments are growing, with some lacking approval from city authorities. Harare City Council spokesperson Stanley Gama told Business Times that the municipality will take action against illegal structures and unlicensed operators. Said Gama: New malls or structures have to be approved and licensed by the City of Harare. Illegal structures will be demolished, while those operating without licences will have their businesses closed down. We don’t tolerate lawlessness. If the City of Harare follows through with its warnings, several newly established malls in the Central Business District may face demolition. City regulations require that any change in business use comply with Section 26 of the Regional, Town, and Country Planning Act (Chapter 29:12 of 1996), which mandates prior approval from the relevant authorities. An urban planning expert, who declined to be named, told Business Times, that the current increase in mall construction has largely been unregulated, with some developments not meeting the minimum operational standards required by law. Said the expert: There is an uncontrolled influx of retail spaces, and some of these structures obstruct pedestrian movement. The city was not designed to accommodate this level of commercial activity in such a disorganized manner. _*Two Pregnant Soldiers Among 200 South African Troops Returned From DRC*_ About 200 South African soldiers have returned from the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). In an interview with SABC News, Pikkie Greeff, the national secretary of the SA National Defence Union (SANDU), said the group included three critically injured soldiers, along with others who were sick, wounded, or dealing with family issues, such as the death of a loved one. Two pregnant officers were part of the returning group. Greeff said that soldiers cannot remain in an operational area while pregnant, though it was unlikely they were deployed while pregnant due to mandatory medical tests before deployment. Earlier this month, 14 SA National Defence Force (SANDF) soldiers were killed, and many others were injured during clashes between M23 rebel forces and DRC government troops. Regarding the presence of South African soldiers in M23-controlled areas, Greeff revealed that sensitive negotiations were ongoing. Said Greeff, as quoted by TimesLive: We know their food supply, electricity, water and so on is subject to M23 control because they’re surrounded by them. They’re basically blocked inside their bases. It’s very frustrating and demoralising. I think the public should know our soldiers do have what it takes to sit it out. We’ll see how the negotiations go. I’m optimistic there will be a solution. SANDU expressed disappointment over the defence department’s lack of clear communication, adding that even the affected soldiers are not regularly updated on the situation or what the authorities are doing on their behalf. Said Greeff: We understand it’s sensitive and there’s a fine line to be walked. There’s so much uncertainty, especially with families and others asking questions that we feel that the department could have been a lot more expressive, reassuring the public that it is taking the necessary steps. The department remaining silent while questions mount by the day, it’s not helpful for the trust the public has in the defence force, for the family members and the soldiers. The soldiers themselves aren’t regularly updated on the situation and what the authorities are doing on their behalf. Over the weekend, 13 of the 14 SANDF soldiers killed in the DRC conflict were laid to rest in their hometowns. _*Betting Shops vs Betting Apps: Which Is Better in 2025?*_ We've all been there - standing in line at a betting shop, feeling the energy of the crowd, the buzz in the air. But then you think, "Isn't it easier to just download Betway and place my bets from the comfort of my couch?" In 2025, the betting world is in the middle of a digital revolution. The once-popular betting shops are facing serious competition from their mobile counterparts. The question is: which one comes out on top? Let's take a closer look at the pros and cons of each, and maybe - just maybe -you'll decide it's time to switch from cash in hand to a tap on the screen. The Good Old Betting Shops Betting shops have been around for decades, and they're still going strong in many places. But in a world where smartphones are glued to our hands, can they still hold their ground? 1. The Thrill of the In-Person Experience If you've ever been to a betting shop, you know it's a vibe. The atmosphere, the chatter, the collective hope that you'll be the one to walk out with a big win. You can't exactly replicate that at home, right? It's a social experience. You get to high-five a stranger when your bet hits or curse the TV when your team loses. You also get the chance to interact with the staff, who, let's be real, have seen it all. They're like the wise old sages of the betting world. 2. Instant Gratification (Well, Almost) One of the biggest perks of betting in person? Cash. When you win, you can walk up to the counter and collect your winnings right there. No waiting for bank transfers or checking your app for updates. It's immediate. That's a huge draw for some bettors who like their rewards served instantly. 3. Limited to Time and Place But let's be honest. For all the fun of betting in person, betting shops have their limitations. They close at some point. You can't just roll out of bed at 3 AM and place a bet. Also, you've got to travel there. And if you're in a hurry? Forget it. Betting Apps: The New Frontier Now, let's talk about betting apps. No more driving to a shop or waiting in line. Just a few taps on your phone, and you're good to go. But does the convenience outweigh the old-school charm of betting shops? 1. Bet From Anywhere, Anytime The beauty of betting apps is that they're always with you. Whether you're on the bus, at work, or sitting on your couch with a cold one in hand, your bets are just a tap away. Want to place a live bet during a game? Done. Want to bet on a cricket match while waiting for your coffee? Easy. Betting apps, like the download Betway app, let you place bets in a flash, anytime you feel lucky. 2. Access to More Markets Here's where the apps really start to flex. In a betting shop, you're usually limited to a handful of events. But online, you're swimming in a sea of options. From niche sports to international events, the variety is overwhelming in the best possible way. Want to bet on esports, horse racing, or even virtual sports? You can do that with an app. The world is your oyster. 3. The Convenience Factor Betting apps make the process seamless. No more fumbling around for cash or worrying about exchanging notes for bets. You can top up your account via card, mobile wallet, or even cryptocurrency. Plus, apps often have more flexible deposit and withdrawal methods than physical shops. Instant access to your account, detailed betting history, and your wins tracked—all without ever leaving the house. 4. Bonuses and Promotions Let's talk about the perks. Betting apps typically throw out all kinds of bonuses to attract users. From free bets to enhanced odds, you'll often get more bang for your buck online than you would in a shop. Plus, loyalty rewards for regular users—because who doesn't love a good deal? The Battle: Which One Wins? Here's the deal: both betting shops and betting apps have their moments. It really depends on what you're after. - Betting shops are for those who crave the social experience, the thrill of immediate cash in hand, and the nostalgia of a traditional betting environment. - Betting apps are for those who value convenience, 24/7 access, and a wider variety of markets. Plus, the chance to download Betway or similar apps gives you access to an entire betting world in your pocket. The winner? Well, it's clear that mobile betting is on the rise, and it's hard to ignore the convenience of betting apps. But hey, there will always be a special place in our hearts for the gritty, fast-paced energy of a betting shop. Whether you're a shop regular or an app enthusiast, you can't lose! _*South Africa launches countrywide blitz on illegal immigrants*_ South Africa has announced a nationwide campaign to flush out illegal immigrants, citing economic pressures likely to be worsened by recent sanctions imposed by Donald Trump's United States government. The operation, set to commence on March 1, 2025, aims to enforce the country's immigration laws and curb the presence of undocumented foreign nationals. In a statement dated February 25, 2025, South Africa's Home Affairs spokesperson, Siya Qoza, said the crackdown would primarily target illegal immigrants from Zimbabwe, Somalia, Ethiopia, Mozambique, Nigeria, and Malawi. "The Department of Home Affairs, under the directive of the Honourable Minister, hereby informs all foreign nationals residing unlawfully in the Republic of South Africa of an impending national operation aimed at enforcing the country's immigration laws," the statement read. "Effective from 1 March 2025, the department, in collaboration with relevant law enforcement agencies, will commence a nationwide operation to identify, arrest, detain, and deport all illegal foreign nationals who are in contravention of the Immigration Act No. 13 of 2002. “Foreign nationals without valid documentation are strongly encouraged to regularise their stay or voluntarily depart the country before the commencement of the operation to avoid legal action. The Department of Home Affairs remains committed to a fair and lawful process and urges all stakeholders to respect the legal requirements governing residence and employment in South Africa." South Africa has long grappled with migration challenges, with thousands of illegal immigrants, particularly from Zimbabwe, continuously entering the country in search of economic opportunities and escaping political instability. According to 2019 statistics, South Africa was home to approximately 4.2 million international migrants, making up about 7.2% of the total population. Despite ongoing deportations, many undocumented immigrants manage to return, underscoring the complexities of border control and regional migration dynamics. The upcoming operation is expected to reignite debates on immigration policy and its economic and social implications, with concerns over potential xenophobic violence and strained diplomatic relations with neighboring countries. _*Trump2025 has ordered HIV projects in SA funded through USAID to shut down —immediately and permanently*_ US President Donald Trump ordered USAID-funded HIV organisations in SA to close down overnight. • Pepfar-funded HIV organisations in South Africa woke up to letters telling them their grants had been ended - permanently. • The letters tell them that "your award is not aligned with Agency priorities" and that "continuing this programme is not in the national interest". • The document also instructs them to "immediately cease all activities, terminate all subawards and contracts, and avoid incurring any additional obligations chargeable to the award beyond those unavoidable costs associated with this Termination Notice". Pepfar-funded HIV organisations in South Africa, who receive their funds through the United States Agency for International Development, USAID, woke up to letters that were sent overnight telling them their grants have been ended - permanently. Pepfar, the President's Emergency Plan for Aids, is a fund that was launched in 2003 to help fight Aids in countries with high HIV infection rates such as South Africa. The country has since received around $8 billion (about R145 billion) of which $439 537 828 (about R8.1 billion) was for the current US financial year, which stretches from 1 October 2024 to 30 September 2025. USAID funds 44 health projects in South Africa. USAID-funded district health projects, supported outside of Pepfar, but with other US government funds administered by USAID, have also been instructed to close down. The Anova Health Institute, the organisation in South Africa which receives the most Pepfar funding, lost all its funding, a senior Anova Health Institute official confirmed to Bhekisisa. Anova helped to test people for HIV and make treatment available in under-staffed government clinics. TB programmes funded through USAID also report having received such letters. Letters were also sent to partners of the Accelerating Programme Achievements to Control the Epidemic (Apace), which include large nonprofits such as the Wits Reproductive Health Institute, Broadreach Healthcare and Right to Care. The Apace projects conducted HIV testing, got people who tested positive onto treatment, got HIV-negative people who needed it onto preventive anti-HIV pills, increased children's access to HIV treatment and also tested and treated people for tuberculosis (TB), the most common illness that people with HIV get when not on treatment. It's not confirmed if all of the USAID-funded organisations received letters, but Bhekisisa has seen confirmation from several projects working on fighting HIV within key populations such as LGBTQI+ groups, and also those working with orphans and vulnerable children, to close down their projects immediately. South African organisations say they have also had reports from Pepfar-funded projects in Kenya and Malawi saying they had received similar letters. Some organisations received emails, with attached letters, which were signed off with "thank you for partnering with USAID and God Bless America" South African organisations say they have also had reports from Pepfar-funded projects in Kenya and Malawi saying they had received similar letters. Some organisations received emails, with attached letters, which were signed off with "thank you for partnering with USAID and God Bless America". The letters read as follows: Dear Implementing Partner, This award is being terminated for convenience and the interests of the U.S. Government pursuant to a directive from U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, in his capacity as the Acting Administrator for the U.S. Agency for International Development ("the Agency" or "USAID") and/or Peter W. Marocco, who is performing the duties and functions of both Deputy Administrators for USAID. Secretary Rubio and PTDO Deputy Administrator Marocco have determined your award is not aligned with Agency priorities and made a determination that continuing this program is not in the national interest. The decision to terminate this individual award is a policy determination vested in the Acting Administrator and the person performing the duties and functions of the Deputy Administrator. I have been delegated authority to issue this termination notice. Detailed instructions will follow, and a formal modification/amendment to memorialize this action is forthcoming. Immediately cease all activities, terminate all subawards and contracts, and avoid incurring any additional obligations chargeable to the award beyond those unavoidable costs associated with this Termination Notice. Immediately provide similar instructions to all subrecipients and contractors. Kindly confirm receipt of this Termination Notice via electronic email response to the sender. From waivers to nothing The new Trump administration froze funding globally for all US-funded aid projects on 24 January. It then announced a limited waiver for some projects on 1 February. Earlier in February, USAID-funded projects in South Africa were asked to apply for 90-day limited waivers, which excluded all HIV prevention activities but most included treatment programmes. They were asked to resubmit work plans that adhered with the waiver rules and also to submit adjusted budgets. But no one had heard back. Instead, many projects received termination letters last night. Pepfar projects receiving their funds through the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) are still operating. A federal judge ordered the Trump administration in February to allow CDC-funded projects to restart their original projects. But many say they've only received funds, so far, to operate until the end of March. Reaction from health experts in South Africa With the help of HIV activists, Bhekisisa is gathering responses to the Trump administration's abrupt cuts of USAID-funded HIV projects. The common theme? South Africa's national health department isn't providing the required leadership during this time, with hardly any communication to partners and the media. Yvette Raphael, co-founder and co-director Advocacy for Prevention of HIV and Aids (APHA) "We are deeply concerned about the bad decision to end USAID. The Trump administration has declared war on the right to health globally. The South African government must take this as an opportunity to expedite universal access to healthcare and meet its obligations to our people." Sibongile Tshabalala, chairperson Treatment Action Campaign chairperson "The NGO sector in South Africa woke to a letter from USAID terminating grants. It is so painful that these terminations mean death to poor people of the world. Key and vulnerable populations are the most affected. These terminations happen at a time when the whole world is bewildered by these outrageous decisions by the Trump administration. "While the Trump administration is fighting for a land Bill that has nothing to do with them and making noise about human rights violations, they are inadvertently committing genocide that will be remembered for years to come. "It is time for the world to speak up and call the Trump administration out for these unfair decisions. "We need our government to step up at this moment in time, we need to hold their feet to the fire. The government must act swiftly and come up with a plan to save lives." Linda-Gail Bekker, CEO of the Desmond Tutu Health Foundation "Saving dollars and spending lives - no words! We now really need to hear the plans from our country health departments how the chaos will be filled urgently." An HIV clinician, speaking anonymously, who has provided the health department with help in its clinics and hospital via Pepfar for 17 years said: "Government has to cease the inaction and their seeming return to the behaviour we saw during the worst years of Aids denialism, where politicians let their own opinions impact hundreds of thousands of lives. This cannot be allowed to happen again." "Eight million South Africans rely on the government's antiretroviral HIV treatment programme and although Pepfar-funded organisations may only account [along with the health department's Pepfar funds] for 17% of the budget, what they do with that 17% is so critical. "Without it, and without an urgent plan to fill the gap, there is no doubt deaths will increase, people will suffer, babies will get infected and die and the monitoring of the programme and its ability to improve and react will become utterly non-existent. "The SA government must now also be held to account to step in as we have seen with Nigeria and other African countries." Fatima Hassan, founder, Health Justice Initiative "One expects a greater sense of urgency and better communication from the health ministry and other departments including the presidency in this time of crisis. They are downplaying the financial and human impact in South Africa, and that will not take us forward. "As civil society we wrote in early February to the government, asking for its urgent plan, we got no response. We wrote again, and a month later we still await its urgent plan, which shockingly, we learnt from media reports that an assessment is being outsourced to Deloitte and will take a month or longer while right now there is a crisis! "We spent decades fighting and litigating for the human right to receive proper healthcare services for HIV especially. This is all going up in smoke because of the impact of the Trump administration’s ideological executive orders and actions and its own defiance of court orders in the US — and because our government has no urgent plan to absorb staff, programmes, patients and communities. "The impact is there for all to see — and frankly, one circular from the national health department which is not even being fully implemented, will not mitigate the chaos. Government should answer — where is the money and where is the plan?" Kholi Buthelezi, director, Sisonke "Sex workers are at increased risk for a range of health issues, including sexually transmitted infections (STIs), TB, HIV, and violence-related injuries. In South Africa, access to regular health screenings, education, and preventive care should be a basic right, not a privilege. When a major funding partner like USAID pulls its support, the ripple effects are felt throughout the entire ecosystem of services designed to support these individuals. This is why the government must step up now." Anon HIV prevention programme implementer in Gauteng "Cutting USAID funding for health and education programmes in South Africa isn't just about budgets - it's about people. It's about sex workers who no longer have a safe place to get HIV prevention services, LGBTI+ communities losing the support they fought so hard for and thousands now facing a future without the healthcare and education they rely on to survive. "These aren't just numbers on a spreadsheet. They are lives, futures, and communities being abandoned. The reality is heart breaking: People will suffer, people will die, and decades of progress will be undone. "This is not just a funding cut - it's a betrayal of the very people these programmes were meant to protect. And yet, from the national health department, there is silence. No communication, no coordination, no urgency - just a deafening void where leadership should be. "The very institutions meant to protect the most vulnerable have offered no plan, no reassurance, no voice. How long must communities wait in fear? How many clinics must close before those in power acknowledge the crisis? This silence is complicity, and it is costing lives." Kate Rees, public health specialist "Our programmes have been officially terminated. Thousands of dedicated healthcare workers across South Africa have been retrenched. I am especially concerned for the community health workers and data capturers, who are financially vulnerable and won't be easily absorbed into the health system. "Despite their years of commitment, these healthcare workers have been abandoned with almost no notice. For patients and communities, critical services have already been impacted - including following up on positive HIV tests for babies, following up on possible meningitis cases, and caring for the most vulnerable pregnant women whose babies are now at risk of contracting HIV." Kholi Buthelezi, Sisonke "Sex workers are at increased risk for a range of health issues, including sexually transmitted infections (STIs), TB, HIV, and violence-related injuries. In South Africa, access to regular health screenings, education, and preventive care should be a basic right, not a privilege. When a major funding partner like USAID pulls its support, the ripple effects are felt throughout the entire ecosystem of services designed to support these individuals. This is why the government must step up now." Public health specialist, anonymous "This is absolutely shattering, heartbreaking, and incomprehensible. The termination letters issued by the US state department in the last 24 hours mark the abrupt and devastating end to years - decades - of investment in lifesaving programmes that have transformed communities, saved countless lives, and built essential infrastructure for health, education, and development. "The intellectual capital, expertise, and dedication poured into these programmes have simply been erased by bureaucratic decisions made overnight. How do you quantify the loss of a child's access to malaria treatment? A mother's TB medication? A community's clean water project? "The people - the patients, the frontline workers, the programme recipients who relied on these services for survival - are now left stranded, abandoned by a system that once promised progress and partnership. "Every contract cancelled is not just a number; it represents a life, a community, a future now in jeopardy. The sheer disregard for the impact on millions of vulnerable people is unfathomable, and the ripple effects of these decisions will be felt for generations to come. _*Zimbabwe external trade statistics for January 2025*_ The total value of exported goods in January 2025 was USD 652.0 million, representing a 5.8 % decrease from USD 692.4 million reported in December 2024. According to latest data by the Zimbabwe Statistics Agency imports for January 2025 amounted to USD 748.8 million, a decrease of 15.8 % from USD 889.7 million recorded in December 2024. The January 2025 trade deficit for goods was USD 96.8 million, translating to a 51.0 % decrease from a deficit of USD 197.3 million recorded in December 2024. Exports by Type of Product : January 2025. Among the top ten products exported in January 2025 were: 💠Semi-manufactured gold: 44.7%, 💠Tobacco: 18.2% and 💠Nickel mattes: 9.3%. Imports by Type of Product : January 2025. The top ten products imported in January 2024 are: ✳️Mineral fuels:19.4%, ✳️Machinery & Mechanical Appliances:12.2%, ✳️Cereals:12.1%, and ✳️Vehicles:8.1% Major Export Destination Countries Percent Contribution to Total Export Value. Among the country’s major export destinations in January 2025 were the ✳️United Arab Emirates: 45.0%, ✳️South Africa: 21.5% and ✳️China: 15.3%. The three countries accounted for around 82% of the total export value of USD 652.0 million. ❎Jan’ 2025 exports value =USD 652.0million ❎Dec’ 2024 exports value=USD 692.4 million Major Import Source Countries Percent Contribution to Total Import Value. Among the major source countries for imports in January 2025 were: 🔵South Africa (38.2%), 🔵China (16.7%), 🔵Bahamas (10.8%) and 🔵Mozambique (4.3%) The four countries accounted for around 70% of the total import value of USD 748.8 million. 🔵Jan 2025 imports value = USD 748.8million 🔵Dec 2024 imports value = USD 889.7 million. Month-on-Month Inflation Rate Year-on-Year Inflation Rate. The USD year-on-year inflation rate (annual percentage change) for the month of February 2025 as measured by the all-items USD Consumer Price Index (CPI), was 15.1 percent. The USD month-on-month inflation rate was 0.2 percent in February 2025, shedding 11.3 percentage points on the January 2025 rate of 11.5 percent.