Sharing A Part From The Article Published By Prof. B. J. Rao In 'Ananthavijaya' Magazine (1990 Issue) : Part 4 SEE EXAMPLE IV Example Chart V page Nos. 242, 243, B.V. Raman man and his mission by B.S. Prakash "Venus is exalted in navamsa In reality Venus is in Taurus in the Natal chart which is not the exaltation Rasi for Venus. Hence there is no point in ascribing. exaltation to Venus in Navamsa. Page 96 of my experiments with Astrology of B.V, Raman "In the navamsa again Saturn is in the sixth house" This statement is unastrological. There is no question of ascribing houses, at the most it can be said as n th navamsa. EXAMPLE CHART VI B.V Raman, March 1962 issue of Astrological Magazine. The aspect of Saturn on Rahu (in the Navamsa) and also afflication arising from Jupiter's ownership of the 3rd and 6th, had their evils to produce. This is not correct analysis. How can there be aspects in Navamsa? The relevent integrated chart proves it. The relevent integrated chart proves it. Aspects are related to angles formed from signs. 7th house aspect is 180 degrees and so on. Rahu is 6th from Saturn in Natal chart and 51st navamsa from Saturn. Then how Rahu be aspected (3rd, 10th or 7th aspects)? How can the author justify this unscientific approach? *The Astrological interpretations based on the navamsa charts are invariably wrong in almost all cases. The learners in Astrology, from the books of so called famous Astrologers who become by virtue of years of astro-journalism, or high qualifications and due to continuous exposure to the public, are accepted by readers of what ever they say or write as the VOICE OF VEDAS. These Daivagnas, instead of cattering scientific Astrology have been throwing out crumps of fradulant unscientific information, by calling real Vedic scholars as quack Astrologers, just because they are not English oriented.* -COMPLETED-