🌞 JYOTIṢĀRṆAVA 🌞

🌞 JYOTIṢĀRṆAVA 🌞

2/16/2025, 2:42:23 AM

https://x.com/Jyotisharnava/status/1890953254877438426?t=1fkrdNeTaAfYRb6zVvxHUQ&s=19

🌞 JYOTIṢĀRṆAVA 🌞

2/14/2025, 2:35:30 PM

https://x.com/Jyotisharnava/status/1890389584199967049?t=-79xMe3cAqurui80hKW3Qg&s=19

🌞 JYOTIṢĀRṆAVA 🌞

2/26/2025, 4:49:23 AM

🔱 Shiva's Words. Jyotiṣa & Daivajña. 🔱 This is a small excerpt from the manuscript translated by me. दैवज्ञं दैववत्पश्येत् नावमन्येत कर्हिचित् । हान्ति श्रेयांसि सर्वाणि दैवज्ञस्यावमानना ॥११॥ [Look upon a Daivajña as you would a divine being and never disrespect him. Disrespecting a Daivajña destroys all merits that one has earned.] यथा प्रकाशयेद्दीप समीपस्थ घटादिकम् । तथा प्रकाशयेलग्नं दैवज्ञाद्भाविकं फलम् ॥१२॥ [Just as a lamp illuminates nearby objects like a pot, so does a Daivajña illuminate the outcomes of one’s fate.] It has been noted that an individual often shifts from one astrologer to another, disparaging previous practitioners and voicing criticisms in the presence of others. Such individuals frequently find themselves without satisfactory answers and continue to search aimlessly due to their own actions. They remain oblivious to the fact that the jyotiṣa vidyā and the expertise of a Daivajña deserve respect; without this respect, obtaining answers to their inquiries becomes unattainable.

🌞 JYOTIṢĀRṆAVA 🌞

2/25/2025, 3:52:19 AM

🔱 Shiva Jātaka. Importance Of Dispositors. Bhāvavṛddhī And Bhāvanāśa. 🔱 If the lord of the rāśi occupied by a bhāveśa is in ucca rāśi, the bhāva under consideration prospers. If the said rāśi lord is in nīca rāśi or associated with Rāhu, the bhāva is destroyed.

🌞 JYOTIṢĀRṆAVA 🌞

2/9/2025, 4:06:31 PM

https://www.reddit.com/r/Jyotisharnava/s/JXiWs8VIlX I have created a Reddit Community for the discussions. In case anyone is interested, you can consider joining.

🌞 JYOTIṢĀRṆAVA 🌞

2/9/2025, 6:28:03 AM

The D-chart concept was introduced by Sri Sheshadri Iyer, drawing from the Tājika system of astrology, which differs from the Arśa jyotiṣa. Tājika system was initially brought to prominence by Arab scholars, and later, Sri Neelakantha authored a work entitled Tājika Neelakanthi. It focuses on solar returns and annual predictions. Sri K. N. Rao, known for his critical stance on classical teachings—often stating that "reading classics is akin to extracting gems from dung"—adopted the methodologies of Sri Iyer. Through his publications, he encouraged students to engage in 'research' and to make extensive use of divisional charts. However, his writings lack practical techniques and are often seen as a mere play of words. Sri Rao's ideas appear to have influenced Pt. Rath, who advanced the concepts by integrating Jaimini astrology. His student, Sri PVR Rao, developed software that provides longitudes in Vargas. When challenged, his explanations tend to be absurd and comical. Another figure in this discourse is Sri VP Goel, who seems to follow Sri Rao's path. He and his students have ensured that novices in astrology remain perplexed, often arriving at no definitive conclusions. They propagate misguided and absurd ideas with unwarranted confidence. However, adhering to such flawed beliefs will yield no positive outcomes, and the guardians of knowledge, the Vidyadhara, may become furious. The individuals at BVB appear unaware of the repercussions of formulating erroneous theories based on their insufficient grasp of the subject. Holding titles doesn't mean that one knows everything under the sky about the subject. They should be ashamed to call themselves as 'Acharya' with zero understanding of fundamentals! I would do anything but never argue with the students of Sri Rao and Sri Goel. It's difficult to convince them that whatever they have learnt is nothing but a myth! Scholars from traditional schools often refrain from verbal discourse; however, they frequently critique the writings of these authors. It is possible to compose a distinct volume that addresses the misleading theories presented in each of these works. My Guru asserts that परनिंदा पापाय। (criticizing others is sinful). Nevertheless, He also encourages the correction of misconceptions related to the subject matter one studies. I do not aim to tarnish anyone's reputation, but the situation compels me to employ strong language to highlight the flawed theories. Inspired from the writings of Prof. B. J. Rao.

🌞 JYOTIṢĀRṆAVA 🌞

2/7/2025, 3:37:22 AM

Shadvarga Or Shodashvarga (Part 1) Excerpts From The Book Published By Sri B J Rao: These divisions are good for academic purpose; but for a horoscope they are more a liability than an asset. Reading a horoscope from the natal chart only gives more accuracy, than with the use of Shadvargas and Shodasavargas. The Shodasamsas are shown as shodasavarga charts like the natal chart. That gives a visual illusion of conjunction of planets which are actually posited in different rasis etc. This aspect is dealt with in Navamsa. With the ayanamsa variation ranging from 0° to 3°20' any exercise of reading the horoscope with the help of shodasavargas is a futile exercise. On the other hand the predictions are bound to be blunders. To drive home this fact the Shodashvarga for one horoscope 24.7.1930 at 17-57Hrs Vizag for Lahari ayanamsa and Raman ayanamsa are shown. A study of them will show that the vargas are different to a large extent and the Shadbalas also have changed. As per Lahari ayanamsa the star is Andhra ending while as per Raman ayanamsa the star is Punarvasu Ist quarter. Ironically K.N.Rao wrote (Page 34 Yogis, Destiny and the Wheel of Time thus "In Navamsha, Moon in the rasi of Mars aspected by Saturn, is another sanyas yoga" Foot note 6 is "It should be in the birth horoscope or the navamsha or drekkana. "This example proves the ignorance of even in the fundamentals as per the following. Rasi is 1/12th of the Zodiac with 30° extent, where as Navamsha is 3°20' in extent. Hence his expression "In Navamsha, Moon in the Rasi of Mars" is a technical blunder, poor expression due to a confused state of mind. In Navamsha Saturn cannot and will not aspect Moon for the following reasons. in the natal chart moon is posited in Leo 0° 06! (Evidently it is be could a cooked up chart to suit his analysis). Which is in Makha Ist quarter and Aries navamsa. The Navamsas and Nakshatra padas. (star quarters) are coterminus. Saturn is in Gemini 15°25' which is in Aridra 3rd quarter and Aquarius Navamsa. Moon is at a distance of 15 Navamsas from Saturn. There are no houses in Navamsa (108 Navamsas). Hence there cannot be and will not be panstary aspects in Navamsa. In natal chart Saturn is no doubt aspecting Moon, but not in Navamsa. It is a wrong way of drawing the charts and reading them. K.N. Rao has extended his blurred yision and blunderous imagination to suggest Saturns aspect or for that matter planetary aspects in Drakkana as well. What a fall mother Astrology at the hands of psudo Astrologers? There should be a limit for madness. In page 43, 44 and 45 his ignorance is magnified. He wrote that (1) In navamsha, from the dasha lord, the fifth house has vargotham, atmakaraka Sun, aspected by putra karaka mercury, a highly benefic spiritual combination. *His 1/2 Kg weight book can fetch 2 rupees by weight, but no knowledge.* Can he explain what he meant by what he wrote. I am sure that he cannot. (c) But then see Vimshamsha the twentieth division. Here, Kumbha is the fifth house of Vimshamsa, with Keth, the gyankaraka, associated with the putrakaraka and aspected by Venus and in the fifth from Kumbha there is saturn aspected by moon. All this is absolute nonsense. *There can be no houses, aspects and conjunctions in shodasa vargas except in rasi chart. K.N. Rao is not only shallow, but thinks every one as fools to be taught nonsense astrology.* He jumped from Parasara to Jaimini and so on to suit his convenience of bluff horoscopy. He went on to explain on page 46 about Vimshamsha thus "The fifth house and the fifth lord in Vimshamsha are superb. There is an exchange between the fifth and ninth lords and the fifth house has Ketu as well, with Mercury, who is also the twelfth lord, the salvation given". All that is unastrological, irrelevant, blundereous and smacks of absolute ignorance of Astrological principals. We need not be surprised if he reads a Hora Chart (1.1.1980 9 PM) as Rahu conjoined with Ketu in Leo, as Sun in Shastastaka (6-8) with Venus in Drakkana and Chaturthamsa Charts, Venus and Sun in samasaptama (Mutual aspect) in Dwadasamsa, again Rahu and Ketu conjoined in Shodasamsa or Vimsamsas, Chaturvimsamaa and other amsa charts. If it suits his story he may forgets that Sun and Venus cannot be at opposite positions, Rahu and Ketu cannot be together as they are always at 180° from each other. He invents houses in all the shodasa (16) vargas. May God save a few hundred students of Astrology who were his students. May God save the people from the Astrologers trained by K.N. Rao and ICAS.

🌞 JYOTIṢĀRṆAVA 🌞

2/4/2025, 1:58:39 PM

Using Dreshkana & Navamsh. This is from my article 'The Jyotisha Of Professions'. Candra is powerful as it is aspected by Bṛhaspati. 10th Lord from Candra is Śukra in Ayudha Drekkana & Candra's Navāmśa in association with Sūrya and Kuja (Kshatriya Graha). The navāmśa dispositor of 10th Lord is under benefic aspect. The 4th bhāva represents the motherland. We conclude that the native will work for the motherland. This native was a colonel in the army. Thus, it is evident that simple and accurate results can be obtained by using rāśi, drekkana and navāmśa.