UPSC ETHICS UPSC UPSC™ UPSC UPSC UPSC UPSC Upsc Upsc UPSC UPSC UPSC UPSC UPSC UPSC UPSC UPSC UPSC™
UPSC ETHICS UPSC UPSC™ UPSC UPSC UPSC UPSC Upsc Upsc UPSC UPSC UPSC UPSC UPSC UPSC UPSC UPSC UPSC™
May 23, 2025 at 02:02 PM
🔆 Key Takeaways on Digital Influence and Misinformation: 📍 Digital Influence and Misinformation: ✅ The rise of digital connectivity in India has increased both access to information and the spread of misinformation. ✅ Influencer-driven content often relies on sensationalism and clickbait, contributing to misinformation. 📍 Vulnerability of India: ✅ According to the World Economic Forum’s 2024 Global Risks Report, India is among the most vulnerable countries to misinformation and disinformation due to a surge in AI-generated content and the influence of social media platforms. 📍 De-Influencing Trend: ✅ A growing trend where influencers discourage consumption for ethical or health reasons, but it may still use misleading or sensational content to drive engagement. 📍 Blurred Lines and Ethical Issues: ✅ Influencers blur the lines between organic and paid content, often mixing facts with selective data and emotional appeals to mislead audiences. ✅ This misleads consumers, especially in sensitive areas like health, nutrition, and finance. 📍 Legal and Regulatory Framework: ✅ Freedom of Speech (Article 19(1)(a)) is not absolute—reasonable restrictions apply under Article 19(2) (defamation, public order, etc.). The Supreme Court has upheld that free speech does not protect spreading misinformation or harmful content. ✅ Consumer Protection Act, 2019 bans misleading advertisements, holding influencers accountable for deceptive promotions. ✅ Digital regulations under the IT Act (sections 66 & 67), the Intermediary Guidelines, 2021, and defamation/e-commerce laws penalize harmful content and ensure accurate endorsements. ✅ Though not legally binding, ASCI guidelines set ethical standards, with non-compliance leading to blacklisting and public reprimands. ✅ SEBI recently imposed strict rules on “finfluencers,” restricting real-time stock data in educational content to prevent influencers from influencing financial decisions without proper expertise or authorization. 📍 Judicial Precedents: ✅ Delhi High Court ruling emphasized claim verification, especially in health content. ✅ Indian Medical Association vs Union of India: The court held influencers accountable for misleading endorsements. 📍 Consumer and Brand Responsibility: ✅ Brands must invest in consumer education, while regulators and platforms should enforce strict guidelines against misinformation. ✅ It is critical to enforce stringent guidelines to hold influencers accountable for their content and unchecked promotional activities, thereby safeguarding consumer interests. 📍 Future Path – Evolving Regulation: ✅ Establishing a registration system or database for influencers disseminating public health information is essential. Such a system would function as a continuous monitoring tool, ensuring transparent accountability for the content produced. ✅ Recognizing the ethical dimensions inherent in public health communication, robust ethical practices must complement legal measures to safeguard public interests.
🙏 1

Comments